# Workout.cool vs Yarrtube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | Yarrtube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 653 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +154 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [Yarrtube](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-yarrtube