# Workout.cool vs wyoming-openwakeword

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | wyoming-openwakeword |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 ✓ | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; wyoming-openwakeword needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [wyoming-openwakeword](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-openwakeword.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-wyoming-openwakeword