# Workout.cool vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Workout.cool | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/workout-cool-vs-wraft