# WordPress vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WordPress | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Content Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 21 508 ✓ | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +76 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

WordPress scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, WordPress is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

WordPress is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WordPress](https://selfhost.directory/project/wordpress) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wordpress.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wordpress-vs-zookeeper