# woodpecker-ci vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | woodpecker-ci | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 065 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.

## Details

- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/woodpecker-ci-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap