# woodpecker-ci vs Zabbix

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | woodpecker-ci | Zabbix |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 28 in CI/CD | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 065 ✓ | 6 518 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 ✓ | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go Template |

## Which one should you pick?

Zabbix scores 75/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.

## Details

- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)
- [Zabbix](https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zabbix.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/woodpecker-ci-vs-zabbix