# woodpecker-ci vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | woodpecker-ci | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 28 in CI/CD | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 8 065 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +157 | +2 430 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 73/100 for woodpecker-ci, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/woodpecker-ci-vs-world-monitor