# WindowsinDocker vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 53 714 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-zookeeper