# WindowsinDocker vs ZeroNet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | ZeroNet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 53 714 ✓ | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 63/100 for ZeroNet, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [ZeroNet](https://selfhost.directory/project/zeronet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zeronet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-zeronet