# WindowsinDocker vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 53 714 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s