# WindowsinDocker vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 53 714 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 ✓ | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; WindowsinDocker needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-zero-k