# WindowsinDocker vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 53 714 ✓ | 6 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +329 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+329 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-zammad