# WindowsinDocker vs Xibo CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WindowsinDocker | Xibo CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 53 715 ✓ | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +330 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+330 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)
- [Xibo CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windowsindocker-vs-xibo-cms