Windows ARMvsZPan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | ZPan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #8 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 2 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.9.0 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for ZPan, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ZPan is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
ZPan is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →ZPan details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep ZPan, compare it with