# Windows ARM vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 2 919 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-zot-registry