# Windows ARM vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 12 825 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +14 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

zookeeper scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, zookeeper is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

zookeeper is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-zookeeper