# Windows ARM vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Batchfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s