# Windows ARM vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 6 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-zammad