# Windows ARM vs Yarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Yarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 4 080 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +28 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM and Yarr score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Yarr is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Yarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-yarr