Windows ARMvsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 4 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM and Yarr score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Yarr is growing faster right now (+28 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Yarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with