# Windows ARM vs Xibo CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Xibo CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 ✓ | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Xibo CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/xibo-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-xibo-cms