Windows ARMvsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Windows ARM details →Xibo CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Xibo CMS, compare it with