Windows ARMvsXibo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Xibo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #3 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 741 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | — |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 57/100 for Xibo, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Xibo.
If you want the quickest setup, Xibo is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Xibo is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Xibo details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Xibo, compare it with