# Windows ARM vs wyoming-piper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | wyoming-piper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #7 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 ✓ | 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.2 · 11 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 52/100 for wyoming-piper, so it is the safer default.

wyoming-piper ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, wyoming-piper is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [wyoming-piper](https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wyoming-piper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-wyoming-piper