# Windows ARM vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-wraft