# Windows ARM vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 89 717 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-world-monitor