# Windows ARM vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-workout-cool