# Windows ARM vs worklenz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | worklenz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 63/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #12 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 3 286 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +104 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v3.3.1 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

worklenz scores 63/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for worklenz.

If you want the quickest setup, worklenz is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

worklenz is growing faster right now (+104 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [worklenz](https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/worklenz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-worklenz