# Windows ARM vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Windows ARM | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 8 066 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +158 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+158 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/windows-arm-vs-woodpecker-ci