# Whiteboard vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Whiteboard | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 10 in Code Review | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 381 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +4 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | diffr/0.1.22 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 56/100 for Whiteboard, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Whiteboard.

If you want the quickest setup, Whiteboard is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Whiteboard is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Whiteboard](https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whiteboard-2.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/whiteboard-2-vs-windows-arm