# Whirl vs WindowsinDocker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Whirl | WindowsinDocker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #23 of 69 in AI Chat | #1 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 510 | 53 765 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +370 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

WindowsinDocker scores 83/100 against 52/100 for Whirl, so it is the safer default.

WindowsinDocker ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Whirl.

If you want the quickest setup, WindowsinDocker is easier to run; Whirl needs more configuration.

WindowsinDocker is growing faster right now (+370 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Whirl](https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whirl.md)
- [WindowsinDocker](https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windowsindocker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/whirl-vs-windowsindocker