# WebCodex vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WebCodex | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #60 of 166 in Developer Tools | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 449 | 8 652 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +153 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.4.6 · 4 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 55/100 for WebCodex, so it is the safer default.

WebCodex ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; WebCodex needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WebCodex](https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webcodex.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/webcodex-vs-workout-cool