# web-check vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | web-check | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in OSINT | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 285 ✓ | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +374 ✓ | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

web-check scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

web-check ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

web-check is growing faster right now (+374 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [web-check](https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/web-check-vs-zookeeper