# web-check vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | web-check | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in OSINT | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 35 280 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +373 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

web-check scores 81/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.

If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

web-check is growing faster right now (+373 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [web-check](https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/web-check.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/web-check-vs-wildbox