WBOvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WBO | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
zookeeper scores 73/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
WBO details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep WBO, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with