# WBO vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WBO | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wbo-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s