# WBO vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WBO | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 | 6 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.18.28 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wbo-vs-zammad