WBOvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WBO | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
WBO and Windows ARM score the same (61/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).
WBO details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep WBO, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with