# WBO vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | WBO | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 | 4 338 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +46 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wbo-vs-whisperlive-cpu