WBOvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WBO | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 2 675 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 3 |
| Latest release | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WhisperLive---CPU scores 64/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for WhisperLive---CPU.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
WhisperLive---CPU is growing faster right now (+46 stars in 30 days).
WBO details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep WBO, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with