wanderervsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| wanderer | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 34 in File Management | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 4 032 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.21.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
wanderer scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, wanderer is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
wanderer is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
wanderer details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep wanderer, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with