# Wallabag vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Wallabag | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wallabag-vs-windows-arm