# Wallabag vs webarchive

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Wallabag | webarchive |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #11 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 ✓ | 200 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 40/100 for webarchive, so it is the safer default.

Wallabag ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for webarchive.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)
- [webarchive](https://selfhost.directory/project/webarchive) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/webarchive.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wallabag-vs-webarchive