Wallabagvswebarchive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wallabag | webarchive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #11 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 | 200 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 40/100 for webarchive, so it is the safer default.
Wallabag ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for webarchive.
Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).
Wallabag details →webarchive details →
Swap a project
Keep Wallabag, compare it with
Keep webarchive, compare it with