# Wallabag vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Wallabag | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 13 032 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +49 ✓ | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.

If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.

Wallabag is growing faster right now (+49 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Wallabag](https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wallabag.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/wallabag-vs-wbo