WallabagvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wallabag | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.
Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).
Wallabag details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Wallabag, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with