# voidaccess vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | voidaccess | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 78 in Security | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 948 | 89 719 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 430 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/voidaccess-vs-world-monitor