# voidaccess vs woodpecker-ci

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | voidaccess | woodpecker-ci |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 78 in Security | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 948 | 8 065 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for woodpecker-ci.

If you want the quickest setup, woodpecker-ci is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)
- [woodpecker-ci](https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/woodpecker-ci.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/voidaccess-vs-woodpecker-ci