# voidaccess vs Wagtail

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | voidaccess | Wagtail |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #28 of 78 in Security | #3 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 949 | 20 594 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +89 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 | v8.0.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Wagtail scores 79/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

Wagtail ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for voidaccess.

If you want the quickest setup, Wagtail is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

Wagtail is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)
- [Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wagtail.md)

## Related comparisons

- [directus vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/directus-vs-wagtail)
- [Ghost vs Wagtail](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ghost-vs-wagtail)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/voidaccess-vs-wagtail