# vLLM vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | vLLM | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 95 789 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 237 ✓ | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

vLLM scores 91/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, vLLM is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 237 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [vLLM](https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vllm.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/vllm-vs-zammad